Skip to main content

GET VPN - part eight (fail-close)




I would like to analyze one scenario where a GM sends data before or during registration process. When the GM is registered the traffic is encrypted like we can see here:

Ping from R3 to R5 (GET VPN active, GM registered)
 
R3#ping vrf GREEN 10.55.55.55 source loo0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.55.55.55, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 100.33.33.33
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 88/104/128 ms
R3#

  
 


Now I disable KS1 and KS2 and clear keys on GM1:

R3#ping vrf GREEN 10.55.55.55 source loo0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.55.55.55, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 100.33.33.33
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
R3#
 













As you see I didn’t receive any response but traffic was sent as a clear text. In my case it was just ping but you can imagine an application that tries to send some data that can be easily eavesdropped.
There is one feature – fail-close - which can block the traffic until a GM will be able to get all keys and start sending traffic over an encrypted tunnel (ESP). There are two methods how to implement it:

a) ACL on interface – you can add permit/deny entries for traffic that should be allowed or not

b) Crypto map – you can set it to work in fail-close mode

I configure the case ‘b’ as the first one is clear.

Assume we have to allow on icmp traffic before the member is registered with a key server but telnet traffic should be dropped:

1) Test if telnet and ping are allowed before I start:
 
R3#telnet 10.55.55.55 /vrf GREEN /source-interface loo0
Trying 10.55.55.55 ...
% Connection timed out; remote host not responding

R3#

And I see the traffic as a clear text:
 



2) Add the access list and enable the feature:
 
access-list 110 deny   icmp any any

crypto map MAPA-GREEN gdoi fail-close
 match address 110
 activate

3) Do the final tests

R3#ping vrf GREEN 10.55.55.55 source loo0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.55.55.55, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 100.33.33.33
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
R3#





R3#telnet 10.55.55.55 /vrf GREEN /source-interface loo0
Trying 10.55.55.55 ...
% Connection timed out; remote host not responding

R3#
 
 
 
 
 
 
As you see above ping is sent as a clear text, telnet is dropped. ‘Deny’ statement means – do not dropped even GM is not registered yet.
Let’s do last test to check if you can ping and telnet once the GM is registered with the KS:

R3#sh crypto gdoi
GROUP INFORMATION

    Group Name               : GDOI-GROUP-GREEN
    Group Identity           : 1
    Crypto Path              : ipv4
    Key Management Path      : ipv4
    Rekeys received          : 0
    IPSec SA Direction       : Both

     Group Server list       : 3.3.3.2
                               6.6.6.2

    Group member             : 7.7.7.2          vrf: MNG
       Version               : 1.0.4
       Registration status   : Registered
       Registered with       : 3.3.3.2
       Re-registers in       : 148 sec
       Succeeded registration: 1
       Attempted registration: 1
       Last rekey from       : 0.0.0.0
       Last rekey seq num    : 0
       Unicast rekey received: 0
       Rekey ACKs sent       : 0
 
 
 
R3#ping vrf GREEN 10.55.55.55 source loo0
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.55.55.55, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 100.33.33.33
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 100/106/116 ms
R3#
 
 
 
 
 
 
And now telnet:

R3#telnet 10.55.55.55 /vrf GREEN /source-interface loo0
Trying 10.55.55.55 ... Open


Password required, but none set

[Connection to 10.55.55.55 closed by foreign host]
R3#
 
 



Once the GM is registered we can ping and telnet and the traffic is encrypted.












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What should you know about HA 'override enabled' setting on Fortigate?

High availability is mandatory in most of today's network designs. Only very small companies or branches can run their business without redundancy. When you have Fortigate firewall in your network you have many options to increase network availability. You can use Fortigate Clustering Protocol ( FGCP ) or Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol ( VRRP ). FGCP has two modes: 'override' disabled (default) and 'override' enabled . I'm not going to explain how to set up HA as you can find many resources on Fortinet websites: https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-two-fortigates-56/ https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-with-fgcp-56/ Let's recap what is the main difference between them. The default HA setting is 'override' disabled and this is an order of selection an active unit: 1) number of monitored interfaces - when both units have the same number of working (up) interfaces check next parameter 2) HA uptime - an

FortiGate and GRE tunnel

Recently I worked on one project where a client requested to re-route web traffic to the GRE tunnel to perform traffic inspection. I would like to share with you what is required if you configure it on FortiGate. We need a new GRE interface and policy base routing (PBR) to change the route for specific source IPs. Of course you need firewall policies to permit the traffic. Let's start with GRE interface. Unfortunately you can't configure it using the GUI, only CLI is the option: config system gre-tunnel edit "gre1" set interface "port1" set local-gw 55.55.55.55 set remote-gw 44.44.44.44 next end When the end peer is Cisco router, you need to set the IP for the GRE interface: config system interface edit gre1 set ip 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.255 set remote-ip192.168.10.20 end In next step we need to fix routing. We need the alternate path via GRE but to keep the route in the active routing table you need to set the same AD (adminis

Inpection of asymmetric sessions on FortiGate

There is one feature available on FortiGate, and I think you should know it, as it modifies a bit what we know about stateful firewalls. In past every packet was treated individually and you had to create policies in both directions. With stateful firewalls we can track connections, and by checking couple of attributes, we can treat them as part of the same session. For example when you initiate connection from a host1 to host2, the returning connection from host2 to host1 will be treated as part of the same connection (session). They have to have the same source/destination and destination/source IPs, port numbers and interfaces.There is an exception from this rule and FortiGate in some specific cases can accept connections on port which was not used in the initial connection. Let me explain how it works on the below example:      The host1 has a default gateway on R1 (10.0.1.2), but you may notice that it is not the optimal path to host2 subnet. When we analyze the packet flo