Skip to main content

FortiGate and GRE tunnel

Recently I worked on one project where a client requested to re-route web traffic to the GRE tunnel to perform traffic inspection. I would like to share with you what is required if you configure it on FortiGate.





We need a new GRE interface and policy base routing (PBR) to change the route for specific source IPs. Of course you need firewall policies to permit the traffic.

Let's start with GRE interface. Unfortunately you can't configure it using the GUI, only CLI is the option:


config system gre-tunnel
edit "gre1"
set interface "port1"
set local-gw 55.55.55.55
set remote-gw 44.44.44.44
next
end

When the end peer is Cisco router, you need to set the IP for the GRE interface:

config system interface
edit gre1
set ip 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.255
set remote-ip192.168.10.20
end

In next step we need to fix routing. We need the alternate path via GRE but to keep the route in the active routing table you need to set the same AD (administrative distance) and change priority to make the path less preferred:

config router static
edit 2
set device "gre1"
set dst 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
set priority 10
next
end

Local-FortiGate # get router info routing-table all

Routing table for VRF=0

Codes: K - kernel, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, B - BGP
O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default

S* 0.0.0.0/0 [10/0] via 55.55.55.254, port1
[10/0] is directly connected, gre1, [10/0]
C 10.0.1.0/24 is directly connected, port3
C 10.200.1.0/24 is directly connected, port1

Local-FortiGate #

Now, once we have the interface and routing we can add PBR, which should change the path for "LOCAL_SUBNET" and TCP/80:

config router policy
edit 1
set input-device "port3"
set srcaddr "LOCAL_SUBNET"
set dstaddr "ALL"
set protocol 6
set start-port 80
set end-port 80
set output-device "gre1"
next
end

Now you can add firewall policies, which permit traffic between LAN and GRE interfaces (not presented here). Let's do a test. ICMP is sent via port1:

id=20085 trace_id=30 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=1, 10.0.1.10:1->77.77.77.77:2048) from port3. type=8, code=0, id=1, seq=165."
id=20085 trace_id=30 func=init_ip_session_common line=5682 msg="allocate a new session-0000229e"
id=20085 trace_id=30 func=iprope_dnat_check line=4942 msg="in-[port3], out-[]"
id=20085 trace_id=30 func=iprope_dnat_check line=4955 msg="result: skb_flags-02000000, vid-0, ret-no-match, act-accept, flag-00000000"
id=20085 trace_id=30 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2591 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-55.55.55.254 via port1"
id=20085 trace_id=30 func=iprope_fwd_check line=726 msg="in-[port3], out-[port1], skb_flags-02000000, vid-0, app_id: 0, url_cat_id: 0"


and TCP via GRE:


id=20085 trace_id=31 func=print_pkt_detail line=5517 msg="vd-root:0 received a packet(proto=6, 10.0.1.10:50731->77.77.77.77:80) from port3. flag [S], seq 2551198907, ack 0, win 8192"
id=20085 trace_id=31 func=init_ip_session_common line=5682 msg="allocate a new session-000022b0"
id=20085 trace_id=31 func=iprope_dnat_check line=4942 msg="in-[port3], out-[]"
id=20085 trace_id=31 func=iprope_dnat_check line=4955 msg="result: skb_flags-02000000, vid-0, ret-no-match, act-accept, flag-00000000"
id=20085 trace_id=31 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2578 msg="Match policy routing: to 77.77.77.77 via ifindex-20"
id=20085 trace_id=31 func=vf_ip_route_input_common line=2591 msg="find a route: flag=04000000 gw-77.77.77.77 via gre1"
id=20085 trace_id=31 func=iprope_fwd_check line=726 msg="in-[port3], out-[gre1], skb_flags-02000000, vid-0, app_id: 0, url_cat_id: 0"

I decided to write the post about GRE and PBR because these topics are not part of NSE4 official training.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What should you know about HA 'override enabled' setting on Fortigate?

High availability is mandatory in most of today's network designs. Only very small companies or branches can run their business without redundancy. When you have Fortigate firewall in your network you have many options to increase network availability. You can use Fortigate Clustering Protocol ( FGCP ) or Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol ( VRRP ). FGCP has two modes: 'override' disabled (default) and 'override' enabled . I'm not going to explain how to set up HA as you can find many resources on Fortinet websites: https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-two-fortigates-56/ https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-with-fgcp-56/ Let's recap what is the main difference between them. The default HA setting is 'override' disabled and this is an order of selection an active unit: 1) number of monitored interfaces - when both units have the same number of working (up) interfaces check next parameter 2) HA uptime - an

MAC Authentication Bypass

One of the method to control your network is using MAB feature. It is helpful in case you have devices without dot1x functionality. Today I will try to implement basic configuration and analyze log messages. There is only one switch SW1 and one device attached to port Fa1/0/2.   ! aaa new - model aaa authentication dot1x default group radius ! ! int Fas1 / 0 / 2 authentication host - mode single - host authentication port - control auto mab ! I haven’t configured ACS yet but let’s see what error message I receive:   SW1 ( config - if ) # mab - ev ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Received MAB context create from AuthMgr mab - ev ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Created MAB client context 0x1100000F mab : initial state mab_initialize has enter mab - ev ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Sending create new context event to EAP from MAB for 0x1100000F ( 0000.0000 . 0000 ) mab - sm ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Received event 'MAB_START' on handle 0x1100000F mab : during state mab_initia

Inpection of asymmetric sessions on FortiGate

There is one feature available on FortiGate, and I think you should know it, as it modifies a bit what we know about stateful firewalls. In past every packet was treated individually and you had to create policies in both directions. With stateful firewalls we can track connections, and by checking couple of attributes, we can treat them as part of the same session. For example when you initiate connection from a host1 to host2, the returning connection from host2 to host1 will be treated as part of the same connection (session). They have to have the same source/destination and destination/source IPs, port numbers and interfaces.There is an exception from this rule and FortiGate in some specific cases can accept connections on port which was not used in the initial connection. Let me explain how it works on the below example:      The host1 has a default gateway on R1 (10.0.1.2), but you may notice that it is not the optimal path to host2 subnet. When we analyze the packet flo