Skip to main content

CompTIA Security+ SY0-601


 

 

In November last year (2020) CompTIA released a new version of Security+ course. I had a chance to deliver the training recently and I would like to share with you my thoughts. 

 

Before I dive into details it is good to know the prerequisites and its objectives. There are many security trainings out there and before attending it, you should know, which one is for you. 

 

CompTIA Security+ is entry level training in the cybersecurity domain. There are no strict prerequisites but you are encourage to know topics covered in A+ and Network+. You do not need to attend the course or pass the exam, knowledge and experience are more important. Before planning the exam you should review A+ and Network+ exam objectives:

 

https://www.comptia.org/training/resources/exam-objectives

 

The updated version has 21 lessons which cover basics, threats, cryptography, risk assessment,  identity management, network security appliances, secure network protocols, incident response, digital forensics, physical security, and many more. As you can see there are plenty of different topics, but because it's entry level course, don't expect to become expert after the training. Everyone, who finishes the course, should be aware of the potential threats around them, and you should know how to minimize the risk of being hacked. 

 

What personally I like about this course is the process of changing student's mindsets. They start to realize how easily someone can get access or at least disturb someone's business. After the course they should come back to their work and notice what around them could be improved to make their organization less vulnerable. It can be something from physical security area, processes, or software patching management. 

 

Because the training covers many topics, once you finish it, you will know security domain fundamentals. You can decide, which of the areas are most interesting for you, and you can continue your path to become the expert.

 

The materials for the previous training versions, depending on the vendor,  where not very good and in many cases I had to prepare own slides to cover specific topics. The new presentations and student guide are very good. What also has been improved is the lab environment. The self-grade labs are very good. They allow you to follow step-by-step instruction. There are also more challenging activities, which can test your knowledge. I think everyone who works in IT can benefit from attending the course.


* I'm not being paid for this post. It's just my personal view on the course I have been teaching for a few years.



 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Mack JohnMarch 17, 2023 at 11:44 AM

    Yes, obtaining CompTIA Security+ certification can be worthwhile as it is a well-respected certification in the field of cybersecurity and can help individuals advance their careers in this field. It validates an individual's knowledge and skills related to foundational cybersecurity concepts and best practices, which are in high demand by employers. Additionally, holding this certification may be a requirement for certain cybersecurity positions or for working with government contracts.

    SY0-701 exam tips and tricks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What should you know about HA 'override enabled' setting on Fortigate?

High availability is mandatory in most of today's network designs. Only very small companies or branches can run their business without redundancy. When you have Fortigate firewall in your network you have many options to increase network availability. You can use Fortigate Clustering Protocol ( FGCP ) or Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol ( VRRP ). FGCP has two modes: 'override' disabled (default) and 'override' enabled . I'm not going to explain how to set up HA as you can find many resources on Fortinet websites: https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-two-fortigates-56/ https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-with-fgcp-56/ Let's recap what is the main difference between them. The default HA setting is 'override' disabled and this is an order of selection an active unit: 1) number of monitored interfaces - when both units have the same number of working (up) interfaces check next parameter 2) HA uptime - an ...
8 comments
Read more

FortiGate and GRE tunnel

Recently I worked on one project where a client requested to re-route web traffic to the GRE tunnel to perform traffic inspection. I would like to share with you what is required if you configure it on FortiGate. We need a new GRE interface and policy base routing (PBR) to change the route for specific source IPs. Of course you need firewall policies to permit the traffic. Let's start with GRE interface. Unfortunately you can't configure it using the GUI, only CLI is the option: config system gre-tunnel edit "gre1" set interface "port1" set local-gw 55.55.55.55 set remote-gw 44.44.44.44 next end When the end peer is Cisco router, you need to set the IP for the GRE interface: config system interface edit gre1 set ip 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.255 set remote-ip192.168.10.20 end In next step we need to fix routing. We need the alternate path via GRE but to keep the route in the active routing table you need to set the same AD (adminis...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inpection of asymmetric sessions on FortiGate

There is one feature available on FortiGate, and I think you should know it, as it modifies a bit what we know about stateful firewalls. In past every packet was treated individually and you had to create policies in both directions. With stateful firewalls we can track connections, and by checking couple of attributes, we can treat them as part of the same session. For example when you initiate connection from a host1 to host2, the returning connection from host2 to host1 will be treated as part of the same connection (session). They have to have the same source/destination and destination/source IPs, port numbers and interfaces.There is an exception from this rule and FortiGate in some specific cases can accept connections on port which was not used in the initial connection. Let me explain how it works on the below example:      The host1 has a default gateway on R1 (10.0.1.2), but you may notice that it is not the optimal path to host2 subnet. When we analyze ...
1 comment
Read more