Skip to main content

VPN - GRE over IPsec SSO

As I promised in my last post I will add the stateful switchover to the following scenario:

blog-gre-over-ipsec3.jpg
The first step is to remove tunnel1 from r5 and r4 and then add tunnel0 on r4. Next implementation of HSRP and changing ‘tunnel source’ on r3 and r4:

R4:
 
!
ipc zone default
association 1
  no shutdown
  protocol sctp
   local-port 5000
    local-ip 10.1.0.4
   remote-port 5000
    remote-ip 10.1.0.3
!
redundancy inter-device
scheme standby VPN
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 10.1.0.4 255.255.255.0
standby 0 ip 10.1.0.100
standby 0 preempt
standby 0 name VPN
standby 0 track 1 decrement 10
standby 0 track 2 decrement 10
standby 0 track 3 decrement 10
!
!
interface Tunnel0
ip address 7.7.7.4 255.255.255.0
tunnel source 10.1.0.100
tunnel destination 10.1.0.5
tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC-PRF
!

R3:
 
!
ipc zone default
association 1
  no shutdown
  protocol sctp
   local-port 5000
    local-ip 10.1.0.3
   remote-port 5000
    remote-ip 10.1.0.4
!
redundancy inter-device
scheme standby VPN
!
!
interface FastEthernet1/0
ip address 10.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
standby 0 ip 10.1.0.100
standby 0 preempt
standby 0 name VPN
standby 0 track 1 decrement 10
standby 0 track 2 decrement 10
standby 0 track 3 decrement 10
!
!
interface Tunnel0
ip address 7.7.7.3 255.255.255.0
tunnel source 10.1.0.100
tunnel destination 10.1.0.5
tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC-PRF
!

Let’s check the redundancy status:
 
r3#sh redundancy inter-device
Redundancy inter-device state: RF_INTERDEV_STATE_HSRP_STDBY_PNC
  Scheme: Standby
      Groupname: VPN Group State: Standby
  Peer present: UNKNOWN
  Security: Not configured
r3#
 
r4#sh redundancy inter-device
Redundancy inter-device state: RF_INTERDEV_STATE_ACT
  Scheme: Standby
      Groupname: VPN Group State: Active
  Peer present: RF_INTERDEV_PEER_NO_COMM
  Security: Not configured
r4#

and the last step to make the VPN aware of the stateful feature (on both peers r3 and r4):
 
!
crypto ipsec profile IPSEC-PRF
set transform-set TS
redundancy VPN stateful
!

Now on r5 we need to change tunnel destination to VIP IP 10.1.0.100:
 
r5#sh run int tun0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 164 bytes
!
interface Tunnel0
ip address 7.7.7.5 255.255.255.0
tunnel source FastEthernet0/1
tunnel destination 10.1.0.100
tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC-PRF
end

Let’s test the switchover.

When I sent the traffic from r6 to r12 I see the log message on the standby peer:
 
r3#
*Nov 21 02:57:32.823: IKE HA: (10.1.0.100) Adding STANDBY IKE SA

*Nov 21 02:57:32.831: IKE HA: Create peer struct for local 104.26.189.68 remote 104.26.189.40 & locked
*Nov 21 02:57:32.839: IKE HA: IKE SA inserted on standby with src = 10.1.0.100, dst   = 10.1.0.5

r3#

Let’s check if we see any SA:
 
r3#sh crypto isakmp sa d
Codes: C - IKE configuration mode, D - Dead Peer Detection
       K - Keepalives, N - NAT-traversal
       T - cTCP encapsulation, X - IKE Extended Authentication
       psk - Preshared key, rsig - RSA signature
       renc - RSA encryption
IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP SA

C-id  Local           Remote          I-VRF  Status Encr Hash   Auth DH Lifetime Ca                           p.

1011  10.1.0.100      10.1.0.5               STDBY  3des sha    psk  5  23:59:37                              
       Engine-id:Conn-id =  SW:11

IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP SA

r3#

Ok, we see ‘STDBY’ status what means it is waiting and ready for the switchover.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What should you know about HA 'override enabled' setting on Fortigate?

High availability is mandatory in most of today's network designs. Only very small companies or branches can run their business without redundancy. When you have Fortigate firewall in your network you have many options to increase network availability. You can use Fortigate Clustering Protocol ( FGCP ) or Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol ( VRRP ). FGCP has two modes: 'override' disabled (default) and 'override' enabled . I'm not going to explain how to set up HA as you can find many resources on Fortinet websites: https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-two-fortigates-56/ https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-with-fgcp-56/ Let's recap what is the main difference between them. The default HA setting is 'override' disabled and this is an order of selection an active unit: 1) number of monitored interfaces - when both units have the same number of working (up) interfaces check next parameter 2) HA uptime - an ...
8 comments
Read more

FortiGate and GRE tunnel

Recently I worked on one project where a client requested to re-route web traffic to the GRE tunnel to perform traffic inspection. I would like to share with you what is required if you configure it on FortiGate. We need a new GRE interface and policy base routing (PBR) to change the route for specific source IPs. Of course you need firewall policies to permit the traffic. Let's start with GRE interface. Unfortunately you can't configure it using the GUI, only CLI is the option: config system gre-tunnel edit "gre1" set interface "port1" set local-gw 55.55.55.55 set remote-gw 44.44.44.44 next end When the end peer is Cisco router, you need to set the IP for the GRE interface: config system interface edit gre1 set ip 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.255 set remote-ip192.168.10.20 end In next step we need to fix routing. We need the alternate path via GRE but to keep the route in the active routing table you need to set the same AD (adminis...
Post a Comment
Read more

IKEv1 aggresive mode

I know that IKEv2 is getting popular but still IKEv1 has a huge presence in production networks. There are many reasons but I’m not going to focus on them. I would rather focus on one issue I see from time to time: ikev1 and an aggressive mode. Just to remind you, there are two modes of ikev1: aggressive and main. The first one is much faster, only three messages are exchanged, but it isn’t secure as the main mode (with six messages). The main problem with the aggressive mode is the first two messages  contain data which may help to perform attack on your VPN. For this test I set up VPN on ASA with ‘aggressive mode’ enabled: ciscoasa# sh run crypto crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set TS esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto map MAPA 10 match address ACL crypto map MAPA 10 set peer 192.168.111.128 crypto map MAPA 10 set ikev1 transform-set TS crypto map MAPA interface inside crypto ikev1 enable inside crypto ikev1 policy 10  authentication pre-share  encryption 3des  hash md5...
Post a Comment
Read more