Skip to main content

CCIE-IOS-NAT

1) static NAT
a) alllow on more than one nat statement:

ip nat inside source static 136.1.128.9 136.1.19.250 extendable
ip nat inside source static 136.1.128.9 136.1.99.250 extendable

b)
 
ip nat inside source static tcp 136.1.128.9 80 interface GigabitEthernet0/1.123 8080

c)
 
access-list 100 permit ip any 136.1.19.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 150 deny ip any 136.1.19.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 150 permit ip any 136.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 190 permit ip any 150.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
route-map VLAN19_SUBNET permit 10
 match ip address 100
!
route-map ALL_SUBNET permit 10
 match ip address 150
!
route-map LOOPBACK_SUBNET permit 10
 match ip address 190
 
ip nat inside source static 150.1.9.9 136.1.99.100 route-map VLAN19_SUBNET reversible
ip nat inside source static 150.1.9.9 136.1.99.150 route-map ALL_SUBNET reversible
ip nat inside source static 150.1.9.9 136.1.99.190 route-map LOOPBACK_SUBNET reversible

Without the word ‘reversible’ it translates all traffic without checking source.

Syslog:
 
ip nat log translations syslog 

2) dynamic NAT
 
ip nat inside source [list | route map] pool POOL

when you need match traffic based on extended ACL you must use route-map, list works fine with standard ACLs.

3) PBR

local one:
 
R1:
access-list 100 permit ip any host 150.1.9.9
access-list 150 permit ip any host 150.1.3.3
!
route-map LOCAL_ROUTING permit 10
 match ip address 100
 set ip next-hop 136.1.99.2
!
route-map LOCAL_ROUTING permit 20
 match ip address 150
 set ip next-hop 136.1.128.2
!
ip local policy route-map LOCAL_ROUTING

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What should you know about HA 'override enabled' setting on Fortigate?

High availability is mandatory in most of today's network designs. Only very small companies or branches can run their business without redundancy. When you have Fortigate firewall in your network you have many options to increase network availability. You can use Fortigate Clustering Protocol ( FGCP ) or Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol ( VRRP ). FGCP has two modes: 'override' disabled (default) and 'override' enabled . I'm not going to explain how to set up HA as you can find many resources on Fortinet websites: https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-two-fortigates-56/ https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-with-fgcp-56/ Let's recap what is the main difference between them. The default HA setting is 'override' disabled and this is an order of selection an active unit: 1) number of monitored interfaces - when both units have the same number of working (up) interfaces check next parameter 2) HA uptime - an ...

FortiGate and GRE tunnel

Recently I worked on one project where a client requested to re-route web traffic to the GRE tunnel to perform traffic inspection. I would like to share with you what is required if you configure it on FortiGate. We need a new GRE interface and policy base routing (PBR) to change the route for specific source IPs. Of course you need firewall policies to permit the traffic. Let's start with GRE interface. Unfortunately you can't configure it using the GUI, only CLI is the option: config system gre-tunnel edit "gre1" set interface "port1" set local-gw 55.55.55.55 set remote-gw 44.44.44.44 next end When the end peer is Cisco router, you need to set the IP for the GRE interface: config system interface edit gre1 set ip 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.255 set remote-ip192.168.10.20 end In next step we need to fix routing. We need the alternate path via GRE but to keep the route in the active routing table you need to set the same AD (adminis...

IKEv1 aggresive mode

I know that IKEv2 is getting popular but still IKEv1 has a huge presence in production networks. There are many reasons but I’m not going to focus on them. I would rather focus on one issue I see from time to time: ikev1 and an aggressive mode. Just to remind you, there are two modes of ikev1: aggressive and main. The first one is much faster, only three messages are exchanged, but it isn’t secure as the main mode (with six messages). The main problem with the aggressive mode is the first two messages  contain data which may help to perform attack on your VPN. For this test I set up VPN on ASA with ‘aggressive mode’ enabled: ciscoasa# sh run crypto crypto ipsec ikev1 transform-set TS esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto map MAPA 10 match address ACL crypto map MAPA 10 set peer 192.168.111.128 crypto map MAPA 10 set ikev1 transform-set TS crypto map MAPA interface inside crypto ikev1 enable inside crypto ikev1 policy 10  authentication pre-share  encryption 3des  hash md5...