Skip to main content

GET VPN - part five (Group Member Authorization List)

In this short post I would like to show one interesting feature that allows us to control which GM can register in a particular KS. I will use the same scenario I used in my previous posts.






There two methods how we can control it:
a) ACL
b) PKI

Let’s try with the first one:

I would like to limit the number of GMs to just only one 4.4.4.2. I need to add firs a standard access list:
 
access-list 50 permit 4.4.4.2

and then add the ACL to the gdoi group configuration (authorization address ipv4):
 
crypto gdoi group GDOI-GROUP
 identity number 1
 server local
  rekey lifetime seconds 300
  rekey retransmit 10 number 2
  rekey authentication mypubkey rsa GETVPN-KEY
  rekey transport unicast
  authorization address ipv4 50
  sa ipsec 1
   profile IPSEC-PROFILE
   match address ipv4 101
   replay counter window-size 64
  address ipv4 3.3.3.2
  redundancy
   local priority 10
   peer address ipv4 6.6.6.2

When I check the member list I see only one: (you need first issue two commands: clear crypto isakmp, clear crypto gdoi):
 
R1#sh crypto gdoi ks members

Group Member Information :

Number of rekeys sent for group GDOI-GROUP : 0

Group Member ID    : 4.4.4.2     GM Version: 1.0.4
 Group ID          : 1
 Group Name        : GDOI-GROUP
 Key Server ID     : 6.6.6.2
 Rekeys sent       : 0
 Rekeys retries    : 0
 Rekey Acks Rcvd   : 0
 Rekey Acks missed : 0

 Sent seq num : 0       0       0       0
Rcvd seq num :  0       0       0       0

R1#

You can find following message:
 
R2#
*Dec 15 18:54:48.835: %GDOI-1-UNAUTHORIZED_IPADDR: Group GDOI-GROUP received registration from unauthorized ip address: 7.7.7.2
R2#

Next method, PKI, is described by Cisco here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_conn_getvpn/configuration/15-2mt/sec-get-vpn.html#GUID-D334DB6B-C3EC-4792-AA0F-B13C25006B5B

and I try to implement it now.
On all clients (R3,R4 and R5) I need to add:
 
 crypto pki trustpoint CA-TP
 subject-name CN=R3.mymicroblog.com,OU=HR

assume that only OU=HR should be able to register at the KS, so on the R5 I change it to:
 
 crypto pki trustpoint CA-TP
 subject-name CN=R3.mymicroblog.com,OU=IT

On all clients I need to change isakmp identity:
 
 crypto isakmp identity dn

On servers I have to add a new crypto identity:
 
crypto identity PKI
 dn OU=HR

so, only clients with organization unit equals ‘HR’ should register. Now I need to add this authorization identity to the crypto gdoi group:
 
crypto gdoi group GDOI-GROUP
 identity number 1
 server local
 authorization identity PKI

On the KS1 I see following message:
 
R1#
*Dec 15 21:04:20.243: %GDOI-1-UNAUTHORIZED_IDENTITY: Group GDOI-GROUP received registration from unauthorized identity:       Dist. name parsing failed. Peer Address: 5.5.5.2
R1#

It means the authorization works fine. Let’s check member list:
 
R1#sh crypto gdoi ks members

Group Member Information :

Number of rekeys sent for group GDOI-GROUP : 0

Group Member ID    : 4.4.4.2     GM Version: 1.0.4
 Group ID          : 1
 Group Name        : GDOI-GROUP
 Key Server ID     : 3.3.3.2
 Rekeys sent       : 0
 Rekeys retries    : 0
 Rekey Acks Rcvd   : 0
 Rekey Acks missed : 0

 Sent seq num : 0       0       0       0
Rcvd seq num :  0       0       0       0

Group Member ID    : 7.7.7.2     GM Version: 1.0.4
 Group ID          : 1
 Group Name        : GDOI-GROUP
 Key Server ID     : 3.3.3.2
 Rekeys sent       : 0
 Rekeys retries    : 0
 Rekey Acks Rcvd   : 0
 Rekey Acks missed : 0

 Sent seq num : 0       0       0       0
Rcvd seq num :  0       0       0       0

R1#

There are only two members, the one excluded has not registered.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What should you know about HA 'override enabled' setting on Fortigate?

High availability is mandatory in most of today's network designs. Only very small companies or branches can run their business without redundancy. When you have Fortigate firewall in your network you have many options to increase network availability. You can use Fortigate Clustering Protocol ( FGCP ) or Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol ( VRRP ). FGCP has two modes: 'override' disabled (default) and 'override' enabled . I'm not going to explain how to set up HA as you can find many resources on Fortinet websites: https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-two-fortigates-56/ https://cookbook.fortinet.com/high-availability-with-fgcp-56/ Let's recap what is the main difference between them. The default HA setting is 'override' disabled and this is an order of selection an active unit: 1) number of monitored interfaces - when both units have the same number of working (up) interfaces check next parameter 2) HA uptime - an

MAC Authentication Bypass

One of the method to control your network is using MAB feature. It is helpful in case you have devices without dot1x functionality. Today I will try to implement basic configuration and analyze log messages. There is only one switch SW1 and one device attached to port Fa1/0/2.   ! aaa new - model aaa authentication dot1x default group radius ! ! int Fas1 / 0 / 2 authentication host - mode single - host authentication port - control auto mab ! I haven’t configured ACS yet but let’s see what error message I receive:   SW1 ( config - if ) # mab - ev ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Received MAB context create from AuthMgr mab - ev ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Created MAB client context 0x1100000F mab : initial state mab_initialize has enter mab - ev ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Sending create new context event to EAP from MAB for 0x1100000F ( 0000.0000 . 0000 ) mab - sm ( Fa1 / 0 / 2 ): Received event 'MAB_START' on handle 0x1100000F mab : during state mab_initia

Inpection of asymmetric sessions on FortiGate

There is one feature available on FortiGate, and I think you should know it, as it modifies a bit what we know about stateful firewalls. In past every packet was treated individually and you had to create policies in both directions. With stateful firewalls we can track connections, and by checking couple of attributes, we can treat them as part of the same session. For example when you initiate connection from a host1 to host2, the returning connection from host2 to host1 will be treated as part of the same connection (session). They have to have the same source/destination and destination/source IPs, port numbers and interfaces.There is an exception from this rule and FortiGate in some specific cases can accept connections on port which was not used in the initial connection. Let me explain how it works on the below example:      The host1 has a default gateway on R1 (10.0.1.2), but you may notice that it is not the optimal path to host2 subnet. When we analyze the packet flo