This is 3rd part from the EIGRP summariztion thread. Please read the previous two as well. I would like to test EIGRP stub feature to see what is the impact on EIGRP behavior. Ever network behind R4, R5 and R6 we may consider as a stub network. If we lose access to one of them, there is no need to query other routers as any of them is a transit network. I modify the configuration on R4-R6 routers: R4#sh run | s eigrp router eigrp TEST1 ! address-family ipv4 unicast autonomous-system 100 ! topology base exit-af-topology network 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 network 10.2.1.0 0.0.0.255 network 10.2.2.0 0.0.0.255 network 10.2.3.0 0.0.0.255 network 10.2.4.0 0.0.0.255 network 10.2.5.0 0.0.0.255 eigrp stub connected summary exit-address-family R4# Now it’s time to shutdown a loopback5 (network 10.3.5.0/24) and check what we see on R4: *Jul 21 18:26:47.874: EIGRP: Received UPDATE on Fa0/0 - paklen 44 nbr 10.2.0.2 *Jul 21 18:26:47.874: AS 100, Flags...